Placeholder Banner

BIO and PhRMA Submit Amicus Brief In Re: Verinata Health Inc., Illumina, Inc. (U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit)

February 9, 2017

BIO and PhRMA submitted an amicus brief in re: Verinata Health, Inc., Illumina, Inc., in support of the petition, which provides an opportunity for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to clarify the uncertainty about the scope of inter partes review (IPR) estoppel.

BIO and PhRMA say the court should grant the writ and clarify Shaw Industries Group, Inc. v. Automated Creel Systems, Inc., 817 F.3d 1293 (Fed. Cir. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 374 (2016), did not restrict the scope of § 315(e) estoppel in IPRs to grounds that were both raised in a petition and instituted and bar all other estoppel as to all other grounds.

No matter how courts ultimately resolve the exact contours of § 315(e) estoppel, there is no basis on which to extend Shaw beyond its facts. Yet, district courts are doing just that, eviscerating the broad IPR estoppel Congress provided for and on which the public relied. To dispel this confusion and restore IPR estoppel to its proper scope, the petition for writ of mandamus should be granted.

Related Resources
17-109 In Re Verinata Health BIO Amicus Brief
BIO and PhRMA Submit Brief of Amicus Curiae In Re: Verinata Health Inc., Illumina, Inc.
Discover More
BIO filed an amicus brief in a continuing effort to challenge courts' decisions that undermine FDA authority and hinder patient access to medications.The brief was filed in the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), following the August 2023…
BIO filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, seeking the reversal of a lower court's ruling that would set aside the 2022 rescission of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) 2020 Rule regulating proxy advisory…
BIO filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on an important and recurring question concerning the framework for determining patent obviousness in patent litigation. BIO argues that courts, when considering whether…